Salmon Bay Indexing

  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Contact

Author Archives: Beth Nauman-Montana

Main Headings 101

Posted on April 29, 2019 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Main headings are carefully chosen terms that create the structure of an index. They reflect the vocabulary of the author and anticipate the vocabulary of the reader. The combination of the main heading and its subentries is an entry array. See also Subentries 101.

A gloss can be used to annotate the main heading. Glosses are often used to indicate the creator of a work, as in “All Along the Watchtower (Dylan),” the location of publication, as in “The Guardian (UK),” and the type of work, “Paris, Texas (film).”

Main headings, best practices for

Main headings should be accurate and concise. Cross-references are used to link related main headings with subentries. Avoid cross-references to main headings without subentries and double-post the term instead. If the main heading has five or more locators, use subentries to aid the reader.

When editing an index, it is sometimes necessary to combine two main headings in order to consolidate closely related concepts into compound main headings. Examples: “intellectuals and intellectualism” and “oil and oil refineries.”

Posted in best practices 101 |

Front Matter / Back Matter

Posted on February 15, 2019 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Posted in book production |

Subentries 101

Posted on February 4, 2019 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Subentries are used to augment and define information related to the main heading. The combination of the main heading and its subentries is an entry array.  In this blog post, I address subentries, which are sometimes referred to as “subheadings.” There are two types of subentries: specific and generic. See also Main Headings 101.

Specific subentries

A specific subentry connects additional information to the main heading, and can often be flipped to create a second main heading pointing to the same information.

horses, Arabian, 6

Arabian horses, 6

courts, restorative justice and, 10

restorative justice, courts and, 10

Generic subentries

A generic subentry does not add new information to the main heading. Instead, it breaks it down into more basic components.

table saws, types of

calculators, features of

The subentries “types of” and “features of” are not specific to their main headings, and are therefore generic.

Using the same generic subentries consistently throughout an index provides the reader with a familiar framework with which to find information.  This is especially useful in indexes for textbooks and other highly formatted texts.

Subentries, best practices for

Subentries that begin with a keyword are followed by an introductory word (and, of, for, etc.). Gerunds can also be used as subentries.

See also

Students of library and information science may recall S.R. Ranganathan’s Colon Classification, in which he divides all things into five fundamental categories: Personality, Matter, Energy, Space and Time (PMEST).

As I acquired experience as an indexer, I began noticing a pattern to subentries.

Building on Ranganathan’s five facets, I then developed a list of main heading types (people, places, things, abstract ideas, and organizations), which I mapped to my collection of generic subentries to keep as a general indexing reference. This document is available by request.

Posted in best practices 101 |

book sales, increasing

Posted on January 16, 2019 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Indexes sell books.https://t.co/41CPwy02MA

— Salmon Bay Indexing (@SalmonBayIndex) January 16, 2019

Posted in indexing profession |

Metatopics 101

Posted on January 2, 2019 by Beth Nauman-Montana

What is a metatopic?

A metatopic is the broadest subject heading used to describe a book. It is often used in the title, especially in the case of textbooks. It is important that the indexer has a good understanding of the metatopic in order to create an index reflective of the content of the book at hand.

Should the metatopic be included in the index?

As a general rule, do not include a main heading for the metatopic because its locators would span the entirety of the book. In its indexing guidelines, Cambridge University Press warns that the metatopic “[entry] would have to be so long and complicated that it would become unwieldy. It would be more practical to have entries on the topics [which] are discussed in the book.”

Exceptions to the Rule

As with all indexing, occasions may arise when it might be useful to the reader to break this rule. If that is the case, treat the main heading carefully. Keep it concise and include cross-references to related entries. The America Society for Indexing suggests that metatopic entries “be used to gather both information of a general nature and information that is inappropriate as its own main heading.”

 

References

American Society for Indexing, “Best Practices for Indexing,” 2015.

Cambridge University Press, “Author Hub Academic Publishing Guidelines: Indexing.”

 

Posted in best practices 101 |

So….what do you do?

Posted on November 6, 2018 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Posted in indexing profession |

Book Publishing Teams 101

Posted on October 2, 2018 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Editorial departments can be difficult to navigate, and job titles and responsibilities vary from publisher to publisher. Wiley demystifies their publishing process with this infographic below.

from Wiley

 

Posted in book production |

In an age when everything is searchable by Google, we need a good index more than ever

Posted on October 1, 2018 by Beth Nauman-Montana

The need for proper indexes is described in this excerpt from The Daily Standard:

A book with a proper index is not only a pleasure, it’s by a country mile much easier to fillet for information, Google notwithstanding. How we organise and access information in an age of overload has never been more important.

Put it this way: when you get your copy of Bob Woodward’s new book, Fear,  about the White House under Donald Trump, are you going to settle down and read it cover to cover — or, like me, will you dive for the index? (A useful indexing innovation might be: “Bits, juicy — pages 7, 9, 13 …)

So support your local indexer. They do vital work, fast, and for not much money; and it’s work an algorithm can’t do.

If you buy a book and it lacks an index, why not register your annoyance with its publisher?

Read the full article.

Posted in indexing profession |

Cross-references 101

Posted on September 6, 2018 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Cross-references enhance an index by providing the reader with additional access points to a text. The number of cross-references in an index will vary depending on the project.

See cross-references
  • point the reader to the preferred main heading
  • do not have page numbers
  • may be used to point to an author’s specific term from a common term (i.e., global warming See climate change)
  • must match the main heading to which they refer
  • must not refer to nonexistent main headings
  • should be avoided by using double-posting when there are only a few locators unless both main headings would appear close together in the final index
See also cross-references
  • point the reader to further information
  • must match the main heading to which they refer
  • must not refer to nonexistent main headings
  • must not refer to another cross-reference (circular cross-references)
  • should be used when double posting subentries as main headings
  • generic cross-references should be used sparingly (i.e., See also specific programs)
Posted in best practices 101, thesaurus and taxonomy development |

indexing, consistency of

Posted on April 17, 2018 by Beth Nauman-Montana

Indexing is both an art and a science.  Good indexing balances the rules that need to be followed, such as style guides and grammar, with subjective decision-making in term selection and arrangement. The concept of indexing consistency deals with the creative aspects of the indexing process, and it is a key component in understanding the construction of indexes.

Indexing consistency can refer to either interindexer consistency (a comparison of the work of two or more different indexers) or intraindexer consistency (a comparison of the work of the same indexer at different times). The subjective nature of choosing index terms will inevitably result in discrepancies. Indexing consistency can be considered a subset of editorial consistency.

For an in-depth look at interindexer consistency with side-by-side examples of indexes created by two different veteran indexers, check out Inside Indexing: The Decision-Making Process by Sherry Smith and Kari Kells.

Posted in best practices 101, indexing profession |

Pages

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Home
  • Services

Archives

  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • June 2016
  • March 2015
  • June 2014

Categories

  • best practices 101 (11)
  • book production (4)
  • embedded indexing (1)
  • indexing profession (11)
  • scholarly indexing (3)
  • specifications (1)
  • thesaurus and taxonomy development (3)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
© 2019 Salmon Bay Indexing